The Accessory Navicular

The accessory navicular is an extra bone or piece of cartilage located on the inner (medial) side of the foot, just above the arch. It is not a part of the normal bone structure and represents a common anatomical variant involving the navicular bone.

Anatomical Overview

The navicular bone is a key structure in the midfoot, supporting the arch and serving as a critical attachment for the posterior tibialis tendon. An accessory navicular develops from a secondary ossification center of the navicular tuberosity that fails to unite with the main body of the navicular during early development. The tibialis posterior tendon inserts into the navicular tuberosity, and the presence of this extra bone can affect the tendon’s function, sometimes leading to arch malalignment or associated foot conditions.

Epidemiology and Genetic Factors

An accessory navicular is found in approximately 4–21% of the population, with a notably higher prevalence of up to 45% reported in some Asian populations. It is more commonly diagnosed in females and is often present bilaterally, with studies reporting a bilateral prevalence between 50–90%. Genetics play a role, and the feature is often associated with a flat (pes planus) foot posture, further complicating the biomechanical picture of affected individuals.

Classification of Accessory Navicular

The most widely accepted classification system is the Geist classification (1914), which organizes accessory navicular bones into three types according to morphology, position, and connection with the navicular:

TypeDescriptionLocation & ConnectionPrevalenceSymptoms
ISmall, round sesamoid bone; os tibiale externumWithin posterior tibial tendon, no cartilaginous connection to navicular~30%Usually asymptomatic
IILarge, triangular or heart-shaped boneConnected by fibrocartilage or hyaline cartilage to navicular tuberosity~50-60%Most likely to be symptomatic
IIIEnlarged navicular tuberosity (cornuate navicular)Osseous fusion; prominent bony enlargement~10-20%Occasionally symptomatic

Type II is the most common and most likely to produce symptoms, often precipitated by trauma, overuse, or footwear irritation that exacerbates local swelling or pain.

Clinical Presentation

Most individuals with an accessory navicular are asymptomatic, discovering the condition incidentally via imaging. However, some develop accessory navicular syndrome, particularly during adolescence or after an acute injury or repetitive stress:

  • Medial foot pain: especially aggravated by walking, running, weight-bearing activities, or stairs.
  • Swelling or palpable bony prominence: on the medial side of the foot, just below the ankle.
  • Shoe irritation: increased friction from footwear over the protuberance can induce inflammation.
  • Difficulty with physical activity: pain may cause limp or limited activity.
  • Association with flat feet: the extra bone can compromise posterior tibial tendon function and arch integrity, leading to pes planus and increased strain.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of accessory navicular relies on a thorough history, physical examination, and imaging:

  • X-rays (Weightbearing): reveal the size, location, and type of accessory navicular present.
  • MRI: used to assess inflammation, particularly in symptomatic Type II cases.
  • Additional imaging: may be required for surgical planning or to exclude other foot pathologies.

Treatment Modalities

Non-Surgical Management

Non-surgical treatment is the first-line approach for symptomatic cases. Options include:

  • Activity modification: reduce activities that exacerbate symptoms.
  • Immobilization: moon-boot or cast may help with acute pain.
  • Pain relief: NSAIDs, ice, corticosteroid injections.
  • Orthotics: arch supports, shoe modifications, and padding to limit friction.

Surgical Management

When non-surgical measures fail or symptoms persist, surgery may be needed. The principal surgical options include:

  • Excision: removal of the accessory navicular bone (modified Kidner procedure), especially effective for smaller Type I and unstable Type II bones.
  • Fixation: removal of the fibrous synchondrosis and fixation of the accessory navicular to the main body of the navicular with a screw, especially in larger or persistent symptomatic Type II cases.
  • Additional procedures: such as correction of associated flatfoot deformity, may be performed when indicated.

Prognosis and Complications

Most individuals with an accessory navicular do not experience long-term complications and remain asymptomatic. For those requiring intervention, proper treatment—whether conservative or surgical—frequently leads to resolution of symptoms and restoration of normal activity levels. Surgical complications are infrequent but may include persistent pain, nerve irritation, or recurrence in rare cases.

The accessory navicular bone is a common, yet often overlooked, anatomical variant in the foot. While usually asymptomatic, it can cause significant discomfort and functional impairment in some cases, particularly adolescents and those with flat feet. Clinical management is guided by symptom severity and the specific anatomical subtype, with most individuals responding well to conservative therapy and only a minority requiring surgery for persistent symptoms. Awareness and early intervention when accessory navicular syndrome is suspected are crucial for optimal outcomes.

The barefoot running champion, Abebe Bikila

Abebe Bikila is remembered as one of the greatest marathon runners in history and a pioneering figure in both Ethiopian and African athletics. Born on August 7, 1932, in the rural village of Jato, Ethiopia, Bikila’s journey from humble beginnings to global stardom is a story of talent, perseverance, and groundbreaking achievements that transformed the landscape of long-distance running forever.

Early Life and Background

Bikila was born into a shepherd’s family in Ethiopia’s Shewa region. Growing up in rural Ethiopia, he was used to running barefoot across difficult terrain—a detail that would later become iconic in his Olympic triumphs. As a teenager, Bikila moved to the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, where he joined the Imperial Guard that protected Emperor Haile Selassie. His athletic prowess was first uncovered during his service, when running was a part of the military training regimen.

His natural talent quickly became apparent, and he began training seriously under the guidance of Onni Niskanen, a Swedish coach hired by the Ethiopian government. Bikila’s rise was swift; he won local races and, showing remarkable endurance and strength, earned selection to the Ethiopian Olympic team at the relatively late age of 24.

Stunning Breakthrough: Rome 1960 Olympics

Abebe Bikila catapulted onto the world stage during the 1960 Olympic Games in Rome. Remarkably, nobody outside Ethiopia knew of him prior to the event. Even more astonishing was his decision to run the marathon barefoot—a choice dictated by the lack of suitable running shoes, but also a reflection of the conditions in which he had trained all his life.

During the marathon, Bikila’s disciplined pace and high-altitude endurance training allowed him to keep up with the leading pack. His stiffest competition came from Moroccan runner Rhadi Ben Abdesselam. In the final stretch, Bikila surged past Ben Abdesselam, breaking the tape at the Arch of Constantine and setting a new world record of 2:15:16.2.

He became the first black African and the first Ethiopian to win an Olympic gold medal, demonstrating to the world that athletes from East Africa could compete with and beat the best in the world at the marathon. Bikila’s barefoot victory also became a symbol of pride for Ethiopia and Africa, inspiring countless young runners across the continent.

The Historic Double: Tokyo 1964 Olympics

The triumph in Rome was not the end of Bikila’s story. Four years later, at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, Bikila competed again—this time under exceptional adversity. Just 40 days before the marathon, he underwent an emergency appendectomy. Despite this major setback, he astonished the world by not only winning the marathon for a second consecutive time (now wearing shoes), but also breaking his own previous world record, finishing in 2:12:11.2.

Bikila’s unprecedented achievement made him the first athlete in history to win two Olympic marathons, successfully defending his title under the most challenging circumstances. His victories introduced the world to the intensity and tenacity of Ethiopian runners and laid the foundation for Ethiopia’s continued dominance in long-distance events.

Later Career and Tragedy

Bikila continued to participate in international marathons after Tokyo, including the prestigious Boston Marathon in 1963, where he finished fifth, and he won twelve out of the sixteen marathons he entered throughout his career. In the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City, however, Bikila’s luck finally turned. Suffering from a broken leg, he was forced to withdraw only 16 kilometers into the race.

Tragedy struck again in 1969, when Bikila was involved in a serious car accident that left him paralyzed from the neck down. The vibrant athlete, whose career had inspired millions, faced the greatest struggle of his life. Showing resilience and courage, he did not allow his disability to end his competitive spirit. He participated in disabled sports, including archery at the 1970 Stoke Mandeville Games in London, a precursor to the Paralympic Games, and even won a cross-country sleigh-riding event for disabled athletes in Norway.

Death and Enduring Legacy

Bikila’s life was cut tragically short when he died on October 25, 1973, at the age of forty-one from complications related to his accident. His funeral in Addis Ababa was attended by tens of thousands of mourners, including Emperor Haile Selassie.

Abebe Bikila remains a national hero in Ethiopia. Monuments, stadiums, and even medals bear his name, and the annual Bikila Award and the Abebe Bikila Award from the New York Road Runners honor his memory and contribution to athletics. Statues and bridges named for him in Ethiopia and Italy ensure that his legacy endures physically as well as symbolically.

Bikila’s legacy stretches far beyond medals and records. He inspired an entire continent, proving that determination, pride, and faith could lift African athletes to the pinnacle of global competition. Elite runners such as Haile Gebrselassie, Kenenisa Bekele, and Eliud Kipchoge have all named Abebe Bikila as a pioneer whose path made their own careers possible.

Abebe Bikila’s achievements reshaped the world’s perception of distance running and revolutionized the presence of African athletes on the global stage. A shy, determined shepherd’s son became a symbol of hope for millions, showing the world the power of humility, resilience, and the unyielding spirit of a champion. Bikila’s record-setting runs, most famously barefoot in Rome, will forever remain a defining moment in Olympic history, inspiring generations and reminding us of the enduring impact one individual can have on the world.

    Abductory Twist During Gait

    The study of human gait is crucial in understanding lower limb function and diagnosing pathomechanical abnormalities. One such abnormality observed during gait analysis is the Abductory Twist. This essay discusses the definition, biomechanics, underlying causes, clinical implications, diagnosis, and management of abductory twist, providing a thorough, evidence-based overview of this unique gait phenomenon.

    Definition of Abductory Twist

    Abductory Twist, also referred to as a medial heel whip, is an observable moment during the stance phase of walking gait when the heel rapidly moves in a medial or abducted direction as the heel lifts off the ground. This sudden movement occurs just as weight transitions off the heel, leading to a visible “twist” or whip of the heel inward. Despite being commonly observed in clinical practice, especially among podiatrists, abductory twist is not a diagnosis or disease but a gait manifestation indicating underlying biomechanical issues.

    Gait Cycle: Where Does Abductory Twist Occur?

    In the standard gait cycle, the stance phase is when the foot is in contact with the ground, supporting body weight. The abductory twist typically occurs during the later part of midstance and the onset of the propulsion phase—precisely, at the instant of heel-off, when the heel leaves the ground but before the toes push off.

    Biomechanics Behind Abductory Twist

    The occurrence of an abductory twist involves a complex interplay of transverse plane motions and inadequate biomechanical compensation within the lower limb. At late midstance:

    • The pelvis and swing leg externally rotate, exerting an external rotational force on the stance limb.
    • If the stance foot is overpronated or unable to supinate adequately, excessive internal rotation of the tibia persists.
    • This results in a buildup of elastic strain energy due to unmatched rotational forces between the upper and lower segments.
    • When the friction of the ground no longer restrains the heel at heel-off, this pent-up energy discharges as a rapid medial twist of the heel.

    Pathomechanical Explanations

    Two main biomechanical scenarios contribute to abductory twist:

    1. Persistent Pronation and Rotational Discrepancy

    • In individuals with overpronated feet, the foot remains pronated (and the tibia internally rotated) longer than it should.
    • Meanwhile, the opposite leg (the swing limb) externally rotates the pelvis and stance leg.
    • Unable to convert to a supinated, rigid lever, the stance foot is “caught” between opposing torque forces.
    • When the heel lifts, the external rotation driven from above is released abruptly through the twist motion in the heel.

    2. First Metatarsophalangeal (MTP) Joint Block

    • If the big toe joint (first MTP) is restricted (due to hallux rigidus, osteoarthritis, or functional hallux limitus), it cannot dorsiflex as needed during propulsion.
    • The body compensates by forcing the foot to roll off the medial side of the forefoot, resulting in a medial whip or abductory twist at the heel.
    • Shoes with excessively stiff forefeet can also mimic this mechanism, further hindering first ray dorsiflexion.

    Additional Causes and Contributing Factors

    Other anatomical or functional abnormalities can predispose or contribute to abductory twist:

    • Loss of ankle joint dorsiflexion range
    • Short or tight calf-Achilles complex
    • Weakness in tibialis anterior or extensor toe muscles
    • Excessive subtalar pronation
    • Limited hip extension or swayback biomechanics
    • Flexion contracture at the knee
    • Poorly fitting or inappropriate footwear

    Clinical Presentation and Observation

    Clinically, the abductory twist manifests as a small, sudden medial movement of the heel at the moment of heel-off. Observers may note concentrically worn patterns in the medial forefoot area of footwear—a sign that repeated rotational twists are present during walking. In many cases, the twist is subtle and best observed from behind as the subject walks away from the examiner.

    Significance and Consequences

    The abductory twist is not inherently pathological but indicates abnormal loading and compensation in the kinetic chain. Its presence points to:

    • Increased muscular effort: Muscles must compensate for inefficient energy transfer.
    • Maladaptive tissue loading: Tissues may sustain loads they were not designed for, increasing risk for overuse injuries in the foot, ankle, or proximal structures.
    • Footwear wear patterns: Can provide supportive evidence for the abnormal movement.

    Ultimately, while the abductory twist itself does not cause pain, it is a marker of ineffective gait mechanics and a risk factor for injury if the primary biomechanical issue is not addressed.

    Diagnosis

    Diagnosis relies on gait analysis—preferably with video slow-motion replay—and careful observation of heel motion during walking. Accompanying assessments may include:

    • Range of motion (ankle dorsiflexion, first MTP joint)
    • Muscle testing (calf flexibility, tibialis anterior strength)
    • Assessment for overpronation, hallux limitus, or other noted abnormalities

    Management Approaches

    Management of abductory twist targets the underlying biomechanical dysfunction rather than the twist itself. Evidence-based approaches include:

    • Orthotic therapy: Foot orthoses can address excessive pronation or offload restricted joints.
    • Physical therapy: Targeted exercises to improve ankle dorsiflexion, calf flexibility, and muscle strength.
    • Footwear modification: Prescription of appropriate shoes with flexible forefoot and good motion control.
    • Surgical intervention (in select cases): For fixed contractures or severe hallux rigidus, surgical options may be explored if conservative therapies fail.

    Prognosis

    With correct identification and addressing of the root biomechanical cause, the abductory twist can be minimized or eliminated. This, in turn, improves functional gait and reduces injury risk.

    The abductory twist during gait is a unique movement characterized by a sudden medial movement of the heel as it leaves the ground. It signals underlying biomechanical inefficiency—most commonly persistent pronation, rotational discrepancies, or obstruction at the first MTP joint. Recognizing the abductory twist provides valuable clinical insight for podiatric and physical therapy professionals. Correct management hinges on addressing the primary biomechanical abnormality through orthoses, physical therapy, and individualized footwear recommendations, ensuring optimal gait efficiency and reduced injury risk for affected individuals.

    Preventing Blisters When Hiking

    Hiking is an activity that combines physical challenge, exploration of the natural world, and a chance for personal growth. However, despite its many rewards, hiking also carries with it numerous physical discomforts, one of the most common being blisters. For many hikers, blisters are seen as an unavoidable annoyance—something to be endured rather than prevented. Yet, with proper preparation, awareness, and care, blisters can often be avoided altogether. The prevention of blisters is not merely about comfort; it is also a matter of safety and endurance. A single severe blister can end a hike prematurely, and in longer expeditions, blister-related issues can significantly compromise performance and increase the risk of infection.


    Understanding Blisters: Causes and Risks

    Blisters are fluid-filled pockets that form between the layers of skin, typically as a result of friction, heat, and moisture. When repeated rubbing occurs—such as the foot sliding inside a shoe—the upper layer of skin separates from the tissue underneath, and fluid accumulates in the gap. Hiking creates the perfect conditions for blisters: prolonged walking, uneven terrain, swelling of the feet, and sweaty socks.

    Major contributing factors include:

    1. Friction – Poorly fitting shoes or rough sock material create hotspots, leading to breakdown of skin.
    2. Moisture – Sweat or water from stream crossings softens the skin, lowering its resilience.
    3. Heat – Warm conditions and increased circulation during hiking reduce the skin’s tolerance to repeated impact.
    4. Pressure points – Shoes that are too tight, or laced improperly, concentrate stress on particular spots.

    If untreated, blisters can pose more than just a nuisance. They may burst, leaving raw skin exposed to bacteria and raising the risk of infection in wilderness conditions where hygiene is difficult to maintain. For long-distance hikers, blister management is one of the most important aspects of staying healthy on the trail.


    The Role of Footwear in Blister Prevention

    The foundation of blister prevention lies in footwear choice. Shoes and boots should be selected carefully, considering fit, function, and terrain.

    Proper Fit

    Ill-fitting shoes are the most common cause of blisters. Shoes that are too loose allow excessive sliding, while shoes that are too tight create constant pressure. Ideally, hiking shoes should feel snug in the heel and midfoot while allowing toe space at the front to prevent jamming on descents. Many experts recommend trying on hiking shoes in the afternoon when feet are slightly swollen, simulating the conditions during a hike.

    Break-In Period

    Even the best boots require a break-in period. Hiking long distances in brand-new shoes is a recipe for disaster. Breaking in footwear through short walks and day hikes allows the materials to soften and mold to the shape of the foot, eliminating stiff edges that might irritate the skin.

    Appropriate Style

    The type of footwear should correspond to the trail demands. Lightweight hiking shoes are suitable for smooth paths, while sturdy boots offer support on rocky terrain. River crossings or very wet environments may call for water-resistant or fast-drying options. Choosing the wrong footwear for the environment often increases blister risk.

    Lacing Techniques

    Proper lacing is often overlooked but can significantly reduce heel lift and foot slippage. For example, the “heel lock” or “runner’s loop” lacing technique prevents the heel from sliding up and down, which is one of the most common causes of blisters in the back of the heel.


    Socks: The Silent Protector

    Socks form the critical barrier between skin and shoe. The choice of hiking socks is just as important as choosing footwear.

    Material Matters

    Cotton socks, though comfortable at first, retain moisture and increase friction. Instead, hikers should use blends of wool and synthetic fibers. Merino wool is especially popular due to its moisture-wicking, breathable, and anti-odor properties. Synthetic blends add durability and quick drying.

    Cushioning and Fit

    Socks with reinforced heels and toes provide cushioning in high-friction zones. However, overly thick socks can sometimes cause shoes to fit too tightly, creating pressure. A balance must be found based on footwear size and hiking conditions.

    Sock Liners

    Wearing a thin liner sock beneath a thicker hiking sock is an effective strategy for blister prevention. The liner reduces friction by allowing movement between the two socks rather than between the sock and the skin. Liners made of synthetic or silk materials are especially effective.

    Changing Socks

    Moisture buildup is inevitable during long hikes. Carrying a spare pair and changing mid-hike, particularly if socks become soaked from sweat or streams, helps maintain dry skin and reduces blister risks significantly.


    Foot Care and Conditioning

    Beyond footwear and socks, the condition of the feet themselves plays a massive role in blister resistance.

    Keeping Feet Dry

    Moisture management is crucial. Using foot powders, moisture-wicking socks, and airing out feet during breaks can significantly reduce blister risk. Some hikers also apply antiperspirant to their feet to decrease sweating.

    Toughening the Skin

    Gradually building up hiking mileage gives the skin and muscles time to adapt. Calluses, when not too thick, can act as natural protectors against friction. However, excessively hardened skin should be gently cared for with moisturizers to prevent cracking.

    Use of Lubricants and Tapes

    Preventive measures such as applying petroleum jelly, specialized blister prevention balms, or sports tapes (like kinesiology tape) on known hot spots can reduce friction. Taping techniques are widely used among long-distance trekkers and ultramarathoners for blister control.


    Hiking Techniques and On-Trail Practices

    Even with the best preparation, hiking behavior on the trail directly affects blister formation.

    Pacing and Breaks

    Hiking too aggressively without resting allows small irritation points to escalate into blisters. Taking breaks, especially on long climbs, gives feet time to cool and dry.

    Listening to “Hot Spots”

    Perhaps the most important skill for blister prevention is early detection. The slight tingling or warming sensation in a particular area is often the start of a blister. Applying tape, bandages, or padding immediately can stop a blister from forming. Ignoring hotspots often leads to larger, more painful injuries.

    Foot Hygiene on the Trail

    Taking a few minutes to rinse or wipe feet during rest stops removes dirt and grit, which act as abrasive particles that amplify friction. At camp, removing shoes and letting feet breathe helps them recover for the next day.


    Emergency and Preventive Gear

    Prepared hikers carry a small “blister kit” as part of their first aid supplies. Essential items include:

    • Athletic tape or moleskin for covering hot spots.
    • Hydrocolloid blister dressings, which cushion and protect damaged skin.
    • Antiseptic wipes to clean a burst blister safely.
    • Spare socks to rotate throughout the hike.
    • Small scissors or nail clippers, since long toenails can cause additional friction inside shoes.

    Having these supplies is not just about treatment; using them preventively allows hotspots to be addressed before they worsen.


    Psychological and Practical Payoff of Blister Prevention

    One might argue that blisters are simply a minor trade-off for the joy of hiking. However, systematically preventing them offers multiple benefits:

    1. Extended Endurance – Without pain, hikers can comfortably travel longer distances.
    2. Safety – A hiker limping from blisters is more prone to trips and falls on difficult terrain.
    3. Morale – Pain-free feet improve overall mood and enjoyment, making the hike more fulfilling.
    4. Group Efficiency – In group hikes, an injured member slows down the entire party. Preventing blisters ensures smoother collective progress.

    Thus, blister prevention enhances both individual well-being and group safety.


    Blisters, though often underestimated, represent one of the most significant obstacles to comfortable and successful hiking. They emerge from a combination of friction, heat, and moisture, yet their prevention is largely within a hiker’s control. Proper footwear that fits correctly, the use of moisture-wicking socks and liners, diligent foot care, informed hiking practices, and carrying appropriate first aid gear all form a system of protection against this common injury.

    Above all, blister prevention requires attentiveness: recognizing discomfort early, adjusting conditions before they worsen, and treating the feet with the same level of respect that hikers give to their backpacks, navigation, or hydration. In the end, preventing blisters is not just about avoiding pain but about enabling a more immersive, rewarding relationship with the outdoors. Pain-free feet empower hikers to push further, stay safer, and fully enjoy the wonders of exploring nature.